Keep iterating...
Machine translation; not fully reviewed and may contain errors. Read the Chinese original
Today’s workload continues, pushing my work to a new level.
The main construction work is in the two aspects of “body construction” and “trading system”. At the level of body shaping, I iterated on a Gem specifically targeted at fitness and fat loss based on the new prompt words. Compared with the previous one, which was limited to a single chat box (it is easy to forget the context after a long time) and a relatively weak AI assistant, this improvement can almost be said to be a “Davis double-click” iteration. Regarding the trading system, his work is aimed at the two fields of US stocks and cryptocurrency. I also conducted in-depth discussions, exchanges and learning about specific strategies with AI. In the U.S. stock/cryptocurrency market, targeted investment paths were discussed regarding specific positions and capital volumes. At the same time, some of my original currencies were screened with the most stringent criteria based on the minimum necessary screening criteria. Therefore, when investing and trading under such circumstances, I no longer wander around blindly without a map as I did in the past.
Of course, in order to facilitate the actual recording and subsequent review and iteration, I passed this requirement to AI and obtained the most satisfactory results so far. Although I was still in a high flow state throughout the whole day today, I still haven’t finished asking all the questions today. I really have too many questions. (After all, my own problems are also being iterated continuously! On average, the same problem is iterated at least 3 times, but there is more than one problem every day! I am building my own work process in a certain field, such as screening value stocks in a certain financial market. I have a set of The minimum necessary MVP framework for me to screen. Why are some of the screening criteria like that? If not, how effective can this be? Is there any way to make it more accurate?
After get off work, or when you are taking a break, you should try your best to completely let your mind go. In many cases, it is precisely because there are too many such moments that it leads to many moments of enlightenment. So I suddenly had answers to specific questions in a certain field, although some of them were not very feasible… I think this is also a benefit of me who likes to let myself go and try new things!
There is a professional term for such moments: “alternating current.” Used to describe thinking in a short state. In contrast, there is another noun: “direct current”, which is used to describe thinking in a focused state. There is also a more interesting similar case: the bee and fly experiment. When you have concrete direction, bee. When there is no direction, just be a fly who is not afraid of making mistakes. I think now I am in a state of trying things like a fly on the basis of basically perfect values. It is also thanks to this that it is difficult for me to have substantial internal emotions. Because the long-term future is quantifiable and considerable, what remains is that there are more short-term challenges.