Continuous iteration

Today’s work is actually directed towards the questions raised in yesterday’s article. Under the new reminder structure, priority reflection work was carried out on those key items. To be honest, today’s workload is much greater than yesterday’s, but this is mainly reflected in the magnitude, because I have already completed most of the quality-related parts in yesterday’s work. Today, we rely on what seems to be “batch operations” to do higher-quality things based on higher-quality gems.

As expected yesterday, after yesterday’s serious update, the quality of today’s work has been virtually improved a lot. The content of the articles originally investigated was usually a lot of lengthy statements, but after today’s efforts, these articles suddenly made a huge leap: the article parts were directly streamlined by half! The content is also more streamlined and targeted. Compared with previous research documents, the content of today’s document may seem a bit too “utilitarian”.

For the construction of my own trading system, I conducted a more targeted, specific and personalized research work auxiliary part to assist my AI Gem to better complete the work. Under the new prompt structure system, the new Gem’s replies, in collaboration with me, unconsciously emerged with many new perspectives and ideas. If my AI continues to be iteratively optimized, I most hope it can have the function of breaking the “dialog box”. Of course, it seems that this idea is unreasonable now, because the result of connecting them will inevitably reduce the quality of the answers. Because when asking a question, I hope it will respond based on the question I asked it in the current dialog box. If we get through it, the result will be the reality of “topic pollution”.

In order to solve this problem, you should first understand what your pain points are? Have it reply to the current chat box question combined with the nearly perfect answer to the question I just asked? But this can be considered, because it does seem important, but it is not important enough that I need to set it up like this…

You should think carefully about what you need to continue to do next after completing the necessary things yesterday.

• The architecture of the super individual (i.e. “one-person company”) system.

Regarding this relatively complex and ultimate work, you need to sort out and carefully structure it repeatedly every day. Because I am really intoxicated by such a system. For example, I like the “compound interest reproduction effect” and “leverage power” that such a structure brings to me. After the frame is built, the remaining part is to fill it with blood and flesh. The rest of the branches will take time to draw. Then the remaining branches and leaves will grow dense enough.

Please do not underestimate the ability to iterate and ignore the terrifying effect of the lever of time. Because all great things are the product of repeated iterations, such as the organizational structure of a country, the code structure of a complex program, etc. However, no matter how fast the iteration capability is, it actually needs an “aesthetic” of continuous iteration to support it. In other words, the self-learning system will be the absolute infrastructure for all of this.